CS547 Human-Computer Interaction Seminar (Seminar on People, Computers, and Design)
Fridays 12:50-2:05 · Gates B01 · Open to the public Previous | Next
Archive
- 20 years of speakers
- By year
- By speaker
- Videos: iTunesU · YouTube
|
December 2, 2011 You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
In 1862, an eccentric Frenchman published two essays about telegraphy:
the first, a proposal for a Chinese telegraph code, and the second, a
critique of Morse Code. Inspired by his study of Chinese, he said
that, while the physical technology of the telegraph - the machinery
of it - was an immense achievement that granted humans a power
bordering on the god-like, the semiotic architecture of telegraphy
remained crude and bounded owing to the close connection between
telegraphic codes and actually existing human languages (namely
English - but also alphabetic languages more broadly). He called for
the development of a perfect universal symbolic language whose
sophistication would measure up to the brilliance of the machine,
rather than hold it back. As Professor Mullaney will show, this
Frenchman's call to action was picked up and examined in China for
some 150 years, to a far greater extent than in any other part of the
world. Whereas the rest of the world, and particularly the
Euro-American world, proceeded to develop ever-more sophisticated
apparatuses of information technology, it was in China where questions
of semiotic interface, user-machine interaction, and mediation were
central to experimentation and innovation for nearly two centuries.
Examining three Chinese character information technologies - the
Chinese telegraph, the Chinese typewriter, and the Chinese dictionary
- Professor Mullaney will examine the ways in which HCI questions were
central to the history of modern Chinese information technology from
the start, and will show that the history of China has involved
something like the inverse of the Frenchman's critique: those working
in the Chinese character information environment went on to develop
interfaces and systems of mediation that far outstripped the
capacities of existing apparatuses, only becoming usable (and
remarkably powerful) with the rise of electrical automation and modern
computing. The paper will conclude with a reflection on a recent
achievement in Chinese history: the development of a Chinese input
method that posts speeds faster than in alphabetic typing, a feat that
was unimaginable only decades earlier.
|
|